Super User

Super User

Monday, 20 January 2014 22:05

Other Media

Review of Portrait of a Scandal by Richard King
January 9, 2014

Richard King on CBC Radio reviews 'Portrait of a Scandal: The Abortion Trial of Robert Notman' for the Homerun book column. Click to listen.

Interview on CBC's Cinq à sept
January 11, 2014

Elaine Kalman Naves interviewed on CBC's Cinq à sept. Click to listen.

Thursday, 09 January 2014 18:36

Portrait of a Scandal

Portrait of a Scandal

Pages: 214 pages
Publisher: Véhicule Press
Date: 2013

Thursday, 09 January 2014 18:28

Buy Now

Purchase Portrait of a Scandal at:

chapters.indigo.ca amazon.ca (Canada) amazon.com (US)
    or from your local independent bookseller
kobo
Thursday, 09 January 2014 18:05

Excerpt

Public Theatre

Only a smattering of people witnessed the arrival of Robert Notman in shackles at the Palais de Justice on the morning of Monday, April 20, 1868 at ten o’clock. Only those ignorant of the workings of the court or greedy for the tiniest tidbit of interest in the case saw him being placed at the bar, or heard the long, complicated and confusing indictment against him. Court-house regulars knew that procedural matters would take up the first hour of the trial. But after the selection of the jury had been rancorously settled – it being exceedingly difficult to put together an unbiased jury – a tide of inquisitive observers swept into the chamber. On foot, on horseback, or by carriage, they came to be entertained, shocked and titillated. Some – perhaps many – came to glean information about the ways and means of terminating an unwanted pregnancy.

The criminal court was located on the ground floor of the east wing of the court house. Panelled in wood to enhance the quality of the acoustics, it had generous dimensions and a twenty-foot-high ceiling. At the front of the room, the judge and lawyers looked like black birds of prey in their long gowns and flapping sleeves. They were the stars of the drama, at least as much as the woman at its heart, and far more so than the man whose fate hung in the balance as they speechified, wrangled, and objected, for he would never take the stand. Rounding out the supporting cast was a wide array of witnesses, a jury, the officers of the court and reporters scratching away furiously in their box, working to daily deadlines for the enlightenment of a larger audience.

On the morning of Monday April 20, 1868, Lewis Thomas Drummond, the judge who would uphold the honour of the law in the case of the Queen versus Robert Notman, was in a state of high cantankerousness. A brilliant man of many parts and perplexing contradictions, His Honour decried the fact that his court room was stuffed to the gills with men, women and youths, all of them agog to view for themselves the principals of the drama – Miss Galbraith and the imprisoned Mr. Notman – and a notable supporting cast. As The Gazette reported the following day, “the list of witnesses … contains the names of many prominent citizens.”

Judge Drummond was well acquainted with the vagaries and frailties of humankind. It was no surprise to him that “the nature of the crime and the social position of the prisoner” made the Notman case a cause célèbre. This understanding only heightened the deeply distressing nature of the matter for him. He knew the defendant, sympathized with the Notman family and held firm views of the crime in question.

Defence counsel Bernard Devlin – a firebrand of the Montreal Irish community – moved for witnesses to leave the room. At this point, the judge gave vent to an extraordinary little outburst. He called for the strictest order to be kept in his chamber, and directed the court constable to clear it of all women and young people and to forbid their return. He then expressed the hope that “he would not again see scandalous scenes repeated, which he had witnessed when of counsel in the Patterson case in which the most disgusting details occurred.”

In the distinguished career of Lewis Thomas Drummond as a jurist, politician and businessman, the case in which he had defended the backroom abortionist Jesse Patterson in 1861 was a mere footnote. But in April 1868, the Patterson case was still fresh in the memory of Montrealers. And quite possibly it still sat heavily on the conscience of the devoutly Catholic judge whose two sons were both Jesuits. Judge Drummond’s abrupt and angry ejection of women from the court room may well have been occasioned by a desire to deny them knowledge of birth control.

*

The Notman case had been making headlines in the city since the beginning of March. By rights it should never have come to light had not a certain Dr. Patton, a newcomer to the city, lost his nerve and precipitated a chain of tragedies. Alfred Patton had served with distinction for several years as a ship’s surgeon, when he decided to hang up his shingle on Craig Street, near Place d’Armes Hill, in October 1867. Hard-working and popular, within weeks he had established “a fair practice.” So said The Gazette of Friday, February 28, 1868, as it announced his sudden death “under painful circumstances.” Painful, indeed: Dr. Patton was all of twenty-eight years old. The subsequent inquest and autopsy found that Dr. Patton had taken poison. In a matter of days, a police investigation led to the conclusion that he had killed himself.

And that is when the furtive course that Dr. Patton, Robert Notman and Margaret Galbraith had been pursuing for some time became fodder for a society that distanced itself from sexual misconduct while it lapped up its every juicy detail. “The authorities are very reticent yet, although the whole affair is it everybody’s mouth,” wrote The Gazette on March 4. “It appears that Mr. Robert Notman, of this city, seduced a girl named Galbraith some time ago.”

The reporter, or his editor, had so little consideration or sympathy for the twenty-five-year-old young woman – she was studying to be a teacher at the McGill Normal School – as to deny according her the Honourific of “Miss.” “The first intimation of the affair was that Galbraith was missing from her boarding house….” Since inquiries made at the homes of her friends yielded no information, “the assistance of a detective was obtained.” The paper didn’t disclose who was responsible for bringing a detective on board, but in the course of his sleuthing someone decided to search a trunk belonging to the girl. Letters in it were "said to implicate Mr. R. Notman.” Further inquiries revealed that Notman, a younger brother of the city’s most successful society photographer, had booked a suite at the St. Lawrence Hall, the city’s best hotel. There drugs were administered to Miss Galbraith and “an operation is said to have been performed on her the effect of which reduced her to such a state of distress and exhaustion that her life was despaired of, and this preying on Dr. Patton’s mind, induced him… to commit suicide.”

*

Even with the court room cleared of women and young people, it remained packed with pumped up spectators. They fidgeted with impatience during the prosecutor's opening address. Heavy-handed, punitive and pitiless, Thomas Kennedy Ramsay was perfectly cast as Crown attorney. He had immigrated to Canada at the age of twenty-one some twenty years earlier, a descendant of a Scottish landed family. Like all successful English-speaking jurists in Montreal, he possessed an excellent command of French. Ramsay was famous for his aggressive manner and meticulous case preparations. He lived for the law, and remained a bachelor all his life. When he was named to the bench a couple of years after the Notman case, The Gazette commended his erudition and pronounced him "a man of the highest character." It then added a snide if understated dig: "He has in some respects made himself unpopular."

Seeking to overwhelm by sheer volume of precedents and esoteric data, Ramsay bathed the jury in the sound of his voice. With dizzying speed, he reeled off statutes by year, number and section, so that the reporters in the box had a great deal of trouble keeping them straight. However, all accounts tallied as to the thrust of what the prosecutor said. The case, according to Ramsay, was of the greatest public consequence and gravity. Any person who administered a drug – "a noxious thing" – or used instruments to bring on a miscarriage was guilty of a felony. The significance of the offence lay not in its outcome. It wasn't necessary to prove that "the noxious thing" was able to induce a miscarriage, or even that the woman to whom it was administered was pregnant, "about which there might exist different opinions." What was crucial was intent.

In other words, the indictment was couched in such a way that even if what Robert Notman had personally or through the agency of Dr. Patton fed Margaret Galbraith was ineffectual, and even if she was not pregnant at the time, he was guilty of felony since his intention had been to frustrate nature. This intention was made explicit by the stay at the St. Lawrence Hall and the operation performed by Dr. Patton.

Ramsay concluded his opening with the usual legal pieties about the jury making its decision based on the evidence presented in court. Jurors were to disregard what they had heard or read about the case, and put aside any feelings of sympathy they entertained for the accused. Before calling his star witness, he tried to head off the line of argument he surmised the defence would use to discredit her: "he would warn the jury against any appeals to passion; or statements… that one of the witnesses for the prosecution was also implicated. No matter if witness was as deeply implicated as prisoner, that did not affect the matter. He would now call Margaret Galbraith as the first witness."

The Gazette at this juncture capitalized and centred the witness's full name. This emphasis in newsprint signaled the current of anticipation that now ran through the chamber. The all-male crowd stirred in their seats, their loins possibly also stirring. Here comes the fallen woman, here comes the hussy, here comes Notman's whore.

*

Adapted from Portrait of a Scandal: The Abortion Trial of Robert Notman by Elaine Kalman Naves, published by Véhicule Press.

Thursday, 09 January 2014 18:01

Details

In the winter of 1868 a name Montreal society associated with art, good breeding, and culture became fodder for scandal mongers. The Notman name, synonymous with fine photography, was suddenly making headlines featuring the words "abortion" and "suicide."

A dozen years earlier, two brothers fled their native Scotland . They were attracted to Montreal by its reputation for making the fortunes of go-getting Scotsmen. One was destined for fame, the other for notoriety.

William Notman, the older brother, eventually owned the largest photography business in North America. His subjects ranged from royalty, Governors General, and the Fathers of Confederation to Sitting Bull and Harriet Beecher Stowe. His studio immortalized the faces and baronial mansions of the merchant princes of Montreal's legendary Golden Square Mile-the Molsons, Redpaths, Allans, and Van Hornes.

By contrast, Robert, the younger brother, was drawn into a drama which shook up Montreal's polite society. After he seduced the beautiful and ambitious Margaret Galbraith, a student at the McGill Normal School, he arranged an abortion for her with an up-and-coming young doctor who soon after committed suicide.

The subsequent trial of Robert Notman became cause-célèbre in the newly minted Dominion of Canada in 1868. Portrait of a Scandal depicts a society that distanced itself from sexual misconduct, while it lapped up its every detail.

Tuesday, 22 October 2013 12:54

Advance Praise

Praise for Portrait of a Scandal 

portrait scandal

"This history has it all: desire and illicit sex, privilege and penury, fame and infamy, the dramatic momentum of an absorbing novel. ...
"Kalman Naves have a novelist's eye and a historian's sleuth-like instincts, with the tenacity of both."

– Ami Sands Brodoff

"Portrait of a Scandal has the air, build-up and tension of a courtroom procedural as historian Elaine Kalman Naves skillfully leads us through the abortion trial of Robert Notman, brother and trusted associate of the great photographer, William Notman. At a time when desperate North American women turned to abortion to end unwanted pregnancies, the judge made Robert’s trial a showcase for his personal vendetta against “this germ of destruction, this moral epidemic” rotting society. In Kalman Naves’ capable hands, Notman’s story is a spellbinding glimpse into the intimate lives of privileged Montrealers, illustrated by stunning photographs of all the principal characters, including Notman’s flamboyant defence lawyer and his nemesis, the plodding but determined prosecutor, and even the doctor who committed suicide [over the case].”

– Elizabeth Abbott

Tuesday, 30 April 2013 14:42

Demitasse

Demitasse

[Photo of Demitasse]

Object
Demitasse
Description

I was born in Budapest after World War II to Hungarian-Jewish Holocaust survivors. My father came from a village in northeastern Hungary called Vaja, where he and many of his ancestors had farmed large estates for generations. After the War, the land of course was gone, nationalized by the Communists. But kindly neighbours had hidden and kept many small family treasures. In the Budapest apartment in which I grew up, these candlesticks, bonbonnieres, and pretty pieces of china were kept in an elegant china cabinet.

We left Hungary in the wake of the Revolution of 1956. Because we came out legally in the spring of 1957, we were allowed to take a few precious items of sentimental value with us. My parents included me, a child of nine, in the decision making process, and I remember that they heeded my counsel to bring a less valuable set of silver candlesticks than the tall modern ones that they purchased after the war, because I said to them, "We should take the candle sticks that came from Vaja."

The demitasse set is also among the few objects we brought from Hungary with us. It was once part of a large set of fine German porcelain: Graf von Henneberg, Ilmenau. The set was also displayed in the china cabinet and was brought out when my parents served espresso to company.

I cherish a particularly fond memory related to these demitasses. My father liked his espresso sweet and would place a sugar cube or two in his cup. I would sit on his lap, enfolded in his arms, as he sipped his coffee. When he was done, there was always a residue of coffee-infused sugar at the bottom, which he would scrape out with what we called a mocha spoon and feed to me.

The warmth of my father’s arms around me, the taste of coffee flavoured sugar, the prettiness of the delicate little object—they form a kind of gestalt of a happy, indulged childhood, and in particular of the closeness that existed between me and my father.

There are darker memories associated with the demitasse set as well, which are recounted in the chapter called "Demitasses" in my award-winning family memoir "Shoshanna's Story: A Mother, A Daughter, and the Shadows of History" (McClelland & Stewart). But I prefer to dwell on the tenderness of the “coffee memory,” and on the fact that this little artefact connects me to a family past in the Hungarian countryside.

Tags
  • childhood
  • coffee
  • porcelain
  • history
Author
Elaine Kalman Naves
URL
http://www.amazon.ca/Shoshannas-Story-Daughter-Shadows-History/dp/product-description/0771067941
Country of origin
Hungary
Country of residence
Canada
Published
2011-06-09
Wednesday, 04 April 2012 14:33

A Fanscinating Look at Tolstoy

A fascinating look at Tolstoy

The word "genius" tends to be overused, but it's hardly controversial to apply it to Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy. Even if you know him only by way of War and Peace and Anna Karenina, and are ignorant of the rest of his 100-volume collected works, Tolstoy's talent dazzles. As a writer, he's regarded as being right up there with Shakespeare in the Western canon. Many critics rate him the greatest novelist ever.

While giving Tolstoy his due as an author in Tolstoy: A Russian Life, British biographer Rosamund Bartlett rates him equally high as a humanitarian. One of his many causes was popular education: While writing Anna Karenina, he mounted a spirited crusade for literacy. In a vast country with an impoverished and illiterate peasantry, Tolstoy was a hands-on champion of education for the masses. He devised his own teaching system, published his own ABC and primers and taught himself Greek in order to bring Aesop's fables to Russian children. He, his wife, Sonya, and their older children instructed peasant pupils on their estate. One of their sons later recalled the gamy smell of the sheepskin coats of the students and the "delightful anarchy" that reigned in the schoolroom.

Such evocative details are among the pleasures to be found in this fascinating account of a huge, mercurial, charismatic and exasperating life. Tolstoy lived from 1828 to 1910, a giant straddling two centuries. Researching War and Peace, he interviewed old soldiers who had beaten back Napoleon at Borodino in 1812. In the second half of his life, he embraced self-abnegation and non-violence, an example that influenced Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King.

The biography begins, like a fat Russian novel, with a map, a chronology and multiple family trees. Bartlett, a scholar of Russian cultural history, approaches her subject through the angle of his essential Russianness, finding in the context of Russian history, politics, literature and the arts the key to his multiple and often contradictory personas of aristocrat, landowner, soldier, war correspondent, gambler, writer, teacher, farmer, beekeeper, holy man, apostate, reformer, anarchist, ascetic and visionary. By the end of his life, he was revered both inside and outside Russia as its foremost citizen.

In this first English biography of Tolstoy since the fall of communism, Bartlett traces the ins and outs of his reputation in Soviet and post-Soviet times. For instance, he is admired by Chechens today, because during his army days in the Caucasus he treated its natives with respect and presented them in a positive light in his war reports.

All this background is interesting, but as one of those readers who comes to Tolstoy's life by way of the two great novels, what gripped me was the personal story, rather than the contextual surround. How did a shy, ungainly orphan bred in the old patriarchal traditions of the nobility on an estate on which serfs were bought and sold like chattel come to question most of the received wisdoms of his time and place, and forge his idiosyncratic path?

The short answer is, genius; the longer one takes 544 pages of small print. An indifferent student, he was a voracious reader from an early age. Obstinate and headstrong, he resented authority, but responded readily to the simple goodness of his Aunt Toinette, one of the great influences of his life. He began to keep a diary when he was 18 - Bartlett considers this, rather than the completion of his first piece of fiction at 23, as having been the beginning of his "turbulent creative journey." His youth was profligate: he lost his virginity at 14, and defined the next 20 years of his life as "crude dissolute living in the service of ambition, vanity and, above all, lust." (He readily exercised the droit de seigneur over peasant girls on Yasnaya Polyana, the family estate on which he was born and lived the bulk of his life.)

He married for love at 34, a woman 16 years his junior. Sonya Tolstaya devoted herself to Lev and tried to live up to his exacting standards for womanhood. This meant being in a perpetual state of pregnancy and lactation, while simultaneously acting as his amanuensis, decoding and copying out his illegible manuscripts. This regime worked for about eight of the 48 years they were together. It broke down in part because of his outrage at the idea of contraception. They had 13 children, eight of whom survived. The last was born when Sonya was 44 and he was 60.

They were happiest during the six-year period he worked on War and Peace, an activity to which he surrendered with pleasure. Writers and aspiring writers should note that in the period between War and Peace and Anna Karenina, Tolstoy attempted a historical novel on Peter the Great 33 times. (He eventually abandoned the project.) Anna Karenina, his greatest artistic achievement, gave him a terrible time. He described it as "vile" and "disgusting" while writing it, and only completed it because he needed money.

Lovers of Tolstoy will enjoy this book. But if you haven't yet read him, do that first.

Tolstoy: A Russian Life

by Rosamund Bartlett Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

Review published in

January 21, 2012

Return to Essays/Articles

Wednesday, 04 April 2012 14:27

Photographer to the queen

'Photographer to the queen'

If you've ever seen vintage PHOTOS of Victorian Montreal and its citizens, there's a good chance those landmarks and faces were captured by the lens of William Notman. And as for those evocative 19th-century Montreal winter scenes - ice jams, pirouetting skaters, tobogganers whooshing down hillsides - they, too, were the work of his studio.

A Scottish immigrant who arrived in Montreal in 1856 harbouring a secret, Notman became the first Canadian photographer of international renown. His subjects ranged from royalty, Governors General and the Fathers of Confederation, to Sitting Bull and Buffalo Bill, Harriet Beecher Stowe and Anna of Anna and the King of Siam fame. His studio immortalized the faces of the merchant princes of Montreal's legendary Square Mile - the Molsons, Redpaths, Drummonds, Allans, and Van Hornes. He didn't only portray them and their families, but also their ornate habitats, recording the lavish trappings of the high-Victorian era: the conservatories, coffered ceilings, vast fireplaces and portraitdecked walls.

But Notman was much more than a society photographer. A rare combination of artist and shrewd businessman, he kept his rates modest enough for ordinary individuals to sit for him. And he went out of his way to invite into his studio people whose trade, garb, or features caught his eye: a Jewish herb doctor with his basket, for instance, or a mustachioed carter sporting a buffalo fur coat tied with a ceinture fléchée. (Sometimes he took their pictures for free, at others he paid them a fee.)

By 1860, four years after his arrival in Canada, Notman had a team of artists and apprentices working for him, so that after that date his insignia on a photo didn't necessarily mean that he was the one behind the camera. Yet there was a distinctive Notman style and vision, no matter who the actual photographer was. Stanley Triggs, a 20th-century curator who rescued the Notman name from oblivion and is the author of several books about him, characterized this style as simple, direct and stately. Triggs has written that Notman "imbued his subjects with an aura of greatness equal to the challenge of the raw new world."

The story of why Notman came to this new world and how he carved out a life for himself in Montreal - eventually owning the largest photography business in 19th-century North America - reads like fiction.

Senior cataloguer Nora Hague of the Notman Photographic Archives is a fount of information about the man, his career and times. The Archives (which include 400,000 glass negatives, 60,000 of which have been digitized) are housed at the Mc-Cord Museum, where Hague has worked for more than 40 years.

Hague explains that for a long time historians were baffled as to why Notman surfaced in Montreal in August 1856. A partner in his father's dry-goods business in Glasgow, he appeared already to be enjoying a settled life with his wife, Alice, and their toddler daughter, Fanny.

"We wondered why, at the age of 30, he just dropped everything and came to Canada, and started an entirely different kind of career," Hague says. Combing through the Glasgow papers on microfilm, a researcher stumbled on a clue: Around the time Notman turned up in Montreal, the contents of his household was being auctioned off back home. Further sleuthing filled in the picture: The Notman family business had gone bankrupt due to Williams's dubious accounting practices. With the prospect of debtors' prison looming, he was - in the colourful Scots idiom of the day - fugitated. That's to say he fled as a consequence of being outside the law.

At the time, Montreal was the industrial, commercial and cultural hub of British North America. Notman likely chose it as his destination because of its reputation for making the fortunes of go-getting Scotsmen. "Certainly the colonies were places where people could go to reinvent themselves," says historian and Gazette Second Draft columnist John Kalbfleisch, author of This Island in Time: Remarkable Tales from Montreal's Past. "Whether they were fleeing the law or at the very least an embarrassment as was William Notman, or whether they were simply seeking better financial opportunities, there was a tradition of heading to the colonies.

"Montreal in the 1850s was an extremely self-confident kind of place. It emerged from the previous decade, a decade of some troubles: of disease in 1847 (and) the burning of the Parliament Buildings in 1849, with a tremendous swagger. All kinds of things started to go right for Montreal in the 1850s. In 1854, Reciprocity - what we now call free trade - was negotiated with the U.S. Trade opportunities began to open up that had not existed before. And also, importantly, the Lachine Canal had been recently widened and improved. Factories began springing up alongside it: flour milling, cotton manufacturers - all sorts of items were now being manufactured in Montreal that previously had to be imported."

Notman's first job in Montreal was with a dry-goods merchant, and he prospered enough to bring over his wife and little girl within three months. But by Christmas 1856, he was on his way to transforming himself into a professional photographer. Though he had practised photography as a hobby back home, this was no guarantee of success.

On Dec. 28, 1856, Alice Notman wrote to her parents in England: "Dear William has his photographing plan ready - and I think will be doing some business in that line next week. He works early & late at it & seems to have a chance of success. ."

With Alice by his side as receptionist, Notman threw himself into the endeavour like a man possessed. He was determined to make good after the shame of his earlier failure. At the back of his little house on Bleury St. he built a room with a skylight. This was the first Notman studio. Customers trooped in right away, though there were several other photographers - they were known as "operators" - in the city.

"Dear Willie is very busy," Alice wrote in April 1857. "His connexion seems extending. . Competent judges tell him his prints are the best that have been done in Canada. . It is wonderful how much he has had to do - but Photography is a good trade here. ."

Capturing and freezing an image has grown so common and simple in our day - the push of a single button - that it's hard to imagine its early complicated technology and initial revolutionary impact. But Notman was tapping into a new art that was on the verge of becoming a huge phenomenon. Photography drew on the Victorians' insatiable appetite for collecting; it indulged the new bourgeoisie's cult of the self.

He attracted clientele both because his photos were excellent and because he was so good with people. A perfectionist, he took great pains posing his subjects and aiming light in the studio in ways designed to play up their features. He arranged elaborate posing stands to immobilize clients' heads and limbs, so they could relax during the long exposures.

Yet even with his painstaking attention to craft and pleasant manners, Notman might merely have ended up one of a number of good photographers working in mid-19th century Montreal. There were other fine professionals in the city. At least one of them - Alexander Henderson - may be considered a better, more atmospheric artist. But Notman's business acumen was equal to his artistic flair.

Shortly after starting out in his new profession, he secured a commission from the Grand Trunk Railway Company to photograph the last stages of the construction of the Victoria Bridge. "The Grand Trunk was the precursor of the Canadian National system," explains John Kalbfleisch. "By 1856, it reached west to Toronto and Windsor. It also ran southeast to the ice-free port of Portland, Me. Up until then all goods arriving from or leaving for Europe had to be ferried across the St. Lawrence in summer, or hauled by cart over ice in the winter. The vital missing link for the company was a bridge over the St. Lawrence at Montreal. At that point the river is almost two miles wide."

The construction of this railway bridge involved a colossal feat of engineering. Its sophisticated tubular design consisted of a steel box laid on top of 24 cut stone piers set into the river. It took five years to build, involved the labour of more than 3,000 men (and many children), and, on completion, became the longest bridge in the world. For a time it was known as the Eighth Wonder of the World.

It's tempting to suggest that photographing the bridge as it was going up was as challenging as building it. Using a method called wet plate photography and glass negatives, Notman worked with an 18-by 22-inch camera, in which the plates were the size of window panes. Over the course of nearly two years, he took mammoth sized photos, often while balancing precariously at the top of the site. According to Stanley Triggs, this was one of the great achievements of recording and documenting engineering projects ever.

And as if this were not enough, Notman managed to attract royal attention to his efforts. The bridge was inaugurated by the Prince of Wales on behalf of his mother, Queen Victoria, in 1860. With a stroke of business genius, Notman floated the idea to the Canadian government of presenting a portfolio of his pictures as the country's official gift to Her Majesty on the occasion.

The so-called Maple Box made a splash in London when it arrived. "It was a good notion of the Canadian Government to employ the celebrated photographer Notman, of Montreal, to prepare a series of photographs of all that is interesting in the Canadas and to present it to the Prince of Wales as a souvenir of his visit to the colony," declared the Illustrated London News, as it detailed the contents of the portfolio in June 1861. Soon after, Notman began calling himself "Photographer to the Queen." It became trendy to pose under the sign bearing this title (for which there is no official documentation) on the pediment of his elegant new limestone studio on Bleury St.

In five short years, the disgraced dry-goods merchant had successfully put the past behind him. By 1861, at the age of 35, William Notman of Montreal, aka Photographer to the Queen, had arrived. Over the remaining 30 years of his life, he would continue to push the boundaries of his craft. There was so much more to be accomplished.

February 18, 2012

Return to Essays/Articles

Wednesday, 04 April 2012 14:21

Memories of parents Sustained him

Memories of parents Sustained him

Child Holocaust Survivor became a sage and a leader

"Out of the depths have I called Thee, O Lord," laments the Psalmist, and his cry is echoed in the title of the reminiscences of Rabbi Israel Meir Lau, formerly Ashkenazi chief rabbi of Israel and currently chief rabbi of Tel Aviv and chairman of Yad Vashem (Israel's Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Authority). Whoever the Psalmist may have been and whatever depths he had plumbed, they couldn't have been deeper or darker than those from which little Lulek Lau emerged in 1945, at the age of 8.

Lulek's first memory was of his father, the rabbi of the Polish town of Piotrków, being whipped by a captain of the Gestapo because the Jew had resisted an order to shave his beard. The child was then 5 and about to part from his parent forever. "When a young boy sees his father - kicked with nailed boots, threatened by dogs, falter from the force of the blow and suffer public shaming, he carries that terrible scene with him for the rest of his life."

Other terrifying events followed. At the age of 6, to prove his "right to live," Lulek performed a back-breaking job in the town's ghetto. Yet the hardships he endured were mitigated by the fierce protectiveness of his indomitable mother. And then, when the ghetto was being liquidated, that mother made a calculated decision on the spur of the moment. Sizing up a scene where women and children were being directed to one side of a platform and men to the other, she shoved the little boy toward the men.

Among those men stood Naphtali, Lulek's 17-year-old brother. Together they were herded onto a train, the child fighting to get back to his mother, Naphtali restraining him. "To separate from your mother is inconceivable; it hurts your whole being for all the years of your life. It took me a long time to understand that when Mother pushed me toward Naphtali, she saved my life."

The maws of the Nazi machine fed on children. That Lulek escaped is remarkable in itself. But that, instead of stunting him, his tragic experiences spurred him on to become a sage and a leader is a tribute not only to his own qualities but to the exceptional people with whom his life was bound up.

This book is many things: survivor story, autobiography, wisdom literature and an unabashed love letter to Israel, the home to which its subtitle alludes. When the two brothers finally arrived there, the state did not yet exist.

The hero of the story is Naphtali, who had made a solemn vow to their father to protect Lulek and convey him to the Promised Land where - so the father had decreed - the child was to perpetuate a dynasty. On both sides of the family the brothers could trace an unbroken rabbinic chain for 37 generations: one thousand years. It's not clear until much later in the narrative why Rabbi Lau Senior had decreed that the one to carry the rabbinic mantle would be the younger son. But in the words "Look out for the boy," Naphtali found his own calling. He stayed alive - barely - when his own will to live flagged, in order to keep Lulek safe.

This in Buchenwald, one of the most dreadful places on Earth.

Without the help of two righteous Gentiles, Naphtali's mission would have failed. Israel Lau pays fulsome tribute to the Russian prisoner and the Czech doctor who befriended him after he was smuggled into the Aryan section of the camp, and separated from Naphtali who was on the Jewish side, where the child wouldn't have lasted a day.

Between 1993 and 2003, Lau served as Chief Rabbi of Israel and hobnobbed with world leaders that included Nelson Mandela, Queen Elizabeth and two popes. His most remarkable encounter, however, was with Fidel Castro in 1994. The Communist dictator had been well briefed on his visitor's history and was staggered by it. "Here in Cuba," he said, "a child of 8 who grows up without his parents - will turn into a juvenile delinquent. - Who raised you, gran rabino? How did a boy from the streets, who started with nothing, get chosen to be the senior religious representative of the country?"

Rabbi Lau's answer is too long to reproduce here. But to explain in a nutshell, his father had foreseen that because Lulek was so young at the outbreak of the war, if he survived, he would be more able to put the war behind him than his much older brother, whose formative years were already over. (In the event, Naphtali proved no slouch. First an eminent journalist, he later became Israel's consul-general in New York.) As well, Rabbi Lau gave credit to his many mentors.

But he deemed that his most important influences of all were his memories of the parents he had so cruelly lost. "Although I was without parents, my father and mother were with me continuously. They never left me, not even for one minute."

Out of the Depths: The Story of a Child of Buchenwald Who Returned Home at Last

by Chief Rabbi Israel Meir Lau

Review published in

March 24, 2012

Return to Essays/Articles

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next > End >>
Page 2 of 7